Home

Cancer

Cancer Types

Links

Site Map

basic_prostate.gif (5152 bytes)

Locally Advanced Prostate Cancers

After surgery (radical prostatectomy) or extended even further in the seminal vesicles or lymph nodes. The risk of a relapse is much higher as noted in the tables below. See nomogram to calculate the risk of relapse after surgery.
the pathologists studies the resected gland and may find that the cancer has broken into or through the prostate capsule
Whether to immediately radiate patients after surgery (called postOp radiation) is discussed here. Using radiation to treat the patient after the PSA has clearly started to rise (called salvage radiation) is discussed here. And for a discussion of how serious it is if the PSA starts rising after surgery go here.


Risk of Relapse at 5 Years by Pathology Findings
    Capsular Penetration  
      None 7%
      Focal extracapsular penetration 18%
      established extracapsular penetration 35%
    Positive Margins  
      None 13%
      focally positive 40%
      extensive positive 65%
    seminal vesicle invasion 86%
    lymph node metastases 95%

5 Year Cure Rate (bNED) after Surgery based on Pathology
(Cancer 2000;88:2110)
confined to the gland 90%
into capsule 88%
focally through capsule 69%
established extracapsuylar spread 45%
positive surgical margins 33%

If the cancer is suspected to be advanced prior to surgery, many urologists will not perform a radical prostatectomy in favor of hormonal therapy with or without radiation. If the cancer is found to be T3 after surgery then some additional therapy is usually recommended (radiation plus or minus hormones).This optimal treatment is still being studied as noted below
J Clin Oncol 1999 Nov;17(11):3664-3675

Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Is Chemotherapy the Next Step?

Oh WK. Management of locally advanced prostate cancer remains controversial. Various single and combination modality approaches have been advocated, but an accepted standard of care remains undefined. The purpose of this review is to define the current knowledge in managing locally advanced prostate cancer and to propose new treatment approaches based on current knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search to detect all relevant articles on the management of locally advanced prostate cancer was performed. A review of the staging, natural history, and prognosis of this disease was also performed. RESULTS: The lack of a clearly defined treatment approach to patients with locally advanced prostate cancer stems from multiple factors, including ambiguities in clinical staging, inadequate knowledge of the natural history of the cancer, and a dearth of comparative randomized trials evaluating efficacy of different therapies. Single modality treatment, including radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiotherapy alone, is associated with high rates of failure. The use of adjuvant hormonal ablation therapy in combination with external-beam radiotherapy has shown improvement in progression-free and overall survival, although similar improvements have not been clearly demonstrated for surgical patients treated with hormonal therapy. New advances in chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer suggest that response rates may be as high as 50% or more, and current trials are evaluating the addition of chemotherapy to hormonal ablation in either surgery or radiation therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Optimal management of locally advanced prostate cancer remains undefined. Standard treatment options include RP, external-beam radiotherapy, or hormonal ablation therapy, alone or in combination. New approaches being tested include improved methods for delivering radiation or combining hormonal ablation with surgery or radiation. It is possible that other forms of systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, may become important components of multimodality treatment. Clinical trials designed to test this hypothesis are ongoing.

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy Sankar J. Kausik, et al. Mayo Clinic
The Mayo Clinic prostate cancer registry list provided 1202 patients with pT3a/b NO prostate carcinoma (no seminal vesicle or regional lymph node involvement) who underwent a radical prostatectomy between 1987-1995. To reduce confounding variables, patients who received preoperative therapy or adjuvant therapy were excluded, resulting in 842 patients who were eligible for analysis. A total of 354 patients (42%) had > 1 positive surgical margins whereas 488 patients (58%) demonstrated no margin involvement. The 5-year survival free of clinical recurrence and/or biochemical failure (postoperative PSA level > 0.2 ng/mL) for patients with no positive surgical margins was 76% and was 65% for patients with 1 positive surgical margin (P = 0.0001). In the current study, positive surgical margins were found to be a significant predictor of disease recurrence in patients with pT3a/b NO prostate carcinoma, a finding that is independent of PSA, Gleason score, and DNA ploidy. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in optimizing recurrence-free survival remains to be tested. Cancer 2002;95:1215-9 see below

Cure Rates at 7 Years after Surgery for T3 Prostate Cancer at Mayo Clinic
Surgical Margin Gleason 5-6 Gleason 7-10
Negative 75%/7y 58%/7y
Positive 51%/7y 44%/7y