Oxidative stress is implicated in
most human diseases. Antioxidants may decrease the
oxidative damage and its alleged harmful effects.
Many people are taking antioxidant supplements, believing
to improve their health and prevent diseases.
Whether antioxidant supplements are
beneficial or harmful is uncertain.
Many primary or secondary prevention trials of
antioxidant supplements have been conducted to prevent
several diseases.
We found that antioxidant
supplements, with the potential exception of selenium,
were without significant effects on gastrointestinal
cancers and increased all-cause mortality.
We did not examine the effect of antioxidant
supplements on all-cause mortality in all randomized
prevention trials.
Our aim with the present systematic
review was to analyze the effects of antioxidant
supplements (beta carotene, vitamins A and E, vitamin C [ascorbic
acid], and selenium) on all-cause mortality of adults included
in primary and secondary prevention trials.
Our systematic review contains a
number of findings. Beta
carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E given singly or
combined with other antioxidant supplements significantly
increase mortality. There is no evidence that
vitamin C may increase longevity. We lack evidence to
refute a potential negative effect of vitamin C on
survival. Selenium tended to
reduce mortality, but we need more research on
this question. We confirm that trials with inadequate
bias control overestimate intervention effects.
Our findings support and extend our previous findings
regarding antioxidant supplements and increased mortality.
A large number of unpublished trials
on supplements may exist. Their results are more likely
to have been either neutral or negative than to have
shown beneficial effects. Accordingly, our estimates of
increased mortality of about 5% is likely to be
conservative.
We only assessed all-cause mortality.
We are not able to determine the cause of the increased
mortality. It is likely that increased cancer and
cardiovascular mortality are the main reasons for the
increased all-cause mortality.
Further study of causes of mortality is
needed. We fear that its assessment may be difficult due
to varying definitions in the included trials. Our results
extend previous reviews
and guidelines, suggesting that
antioxidant supplements may not be beneficial.
Beta carotene, administered singly or
in combination with other antioxidants, significantly
increased all-cause mortality. Recent studies have
suggested that beta carotene may act as a cocarcinogen.
Vitamin A combined with other
antioxidants significantly increased mortality. We found
that vitamin E given singly or combined with 4 other
antioxidants did not significantly influence mortality.
After exclusion of high-bias risk trials, however, vitamin E
given singly or combined significantly increased mortality.
This is in agreement with a recent meta-analysis.
Dose of vitamin E was without significant
effect on mortality in our analysis. The chance that
vitamin E may benefit seems low.
The trials in which vitamin C was
applied singly or in different combinations with beta
carotene, vitamin A, vitamin E, and selenium found no
significant effect on mortality. According to the CIs,
small beneficial or large harmful effects cannot be excluded.
We calculated the proportion of participants who died in the
trials in which participants took vitamin C alone. In the
control group it was 0.019 and in the vitamin C group it
was 0.017. With
set to .05 and power to .90, the required sample size
would be 186 000 participants. We are still far from having
examined a sufficient sample. Studies have demonstrated that
vitamin C may act as both a pro-oxidant and as an antioxidant
in vivo, and trials should be monitored closely for harm.
Selenium given singly or in
combination with other supplements seemed to
significantly decrease mortality, but after exclusion of
high-bias risk trials, the effect disappeared. Results of
ongoing randomized trials with selenium will likely increase
our understanding of the effects of selenium.
Our findings contradict the findings
of observational studies, claiming that antioxidants
improve health. Considering that 10% to 20% of the adult
population (80-160 million people) in North America and
Europe may consume the assessed supplements, the public
health consequences may be substantial. We are exposed to
intense marketing with a contrary statement, which is also
reflected by the high number of publications per included
randomized trial found in the present review.
There are several possible
explanations for the negative effect of antioxidant
supplements on mortality. Although oxidative stress has a
hypothesized role in the pathogenesis of many chronic
diseases, it may be the consequence of pathological conditions.
By eliminating free radicals from our
organism, we interfere with some essential defensive
mechanisms like apoptosis, phagocytosis, and
detoxification. Antioxidant supplements are synthetic and
not subjected to the same rigorous toxicity studies as other
pharmaceutical agents. Better understanding of mechanisms
and actions of antioxidants in relation to a potential disease
is needed.
Because we examined only the
influence of synthetic antioxidants, our findings should
not be translated to potential effects of fruits and
vegetables. |