breast_supraclav_vanderspragen.jpg (15726 bytes)

Detection, treatment, and outcome of isolated supraclavicular recurrence in 42 patients with invasive breast carcinoma.

van der Sangen MJ, Coebergh JW, Roumen RM, Rutten HJ, Vreugdenhil G, Voogd AC.    Cancer. 2003 Jul 1;98(1):11-7.

Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: There still is debate as to whether breast carcinoma patients with isolated supraclavicular recurrence should be considered to be patients with disseminated disease or patients for whom aggressive treatment with curative intent is justified. METHODS: In the period 1984-1994, 4669 patients with invasive breast carcinoma underwent axillary dissection in 1 of 8 community hospitals in the southeastern part of the Netherlands. During follow-up, 42 patients with isolated supraclavicular recurrence, without other sites of distant disease, were identified. RESULTS: The median interval between treatment of the primary tumor and diagnosis of the supraclavicular recurrence was 2.5 years (range, 0.2-11.5 years). Radiotherapy was administered to 25 patients (60%), 5 of whom also underwent surgery and 16 of whom also received chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Eleven patients received hormonal therapy only, and four received chemotherapy only. One patient received surgical treatment only, and one patient remained untreated. Complete remission was achieved in 35 patients (83%), but a second supraclavicular recurrence occurred in 12 (34% of patients who achieved complete remission). Overall, 6 patients (14%) were alive without evidence of disease after a follow-up period of 4.4-8.3 years. The 5-year actuarial overall survival and distant disease-free survival rates, based on the date of diagnosis of supraclavicular recurrence, were 38% and 22%  respectively. The distant disease-free survival rate was somewhat better for the 25 patients who underwent radiotherapy as part of the treatment for supraclavicular recurrence than it was for the 17 patients who did not receive radiotherapy (P = 0.06); the difference became more pronounced after the exclusion of 8 patients who had received axillary and supraclavicular radiotherapy as part of treatment for the primary tumor (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although complete remission can be obtained in most patients with isolated supraclavicular recurrence, the prognosis for these patients is poor. Involved field radiotherapy appears to play an important role in the treatment of supraclavicular recurrence and may improve the distant recurrence-free survival rate.

In the current study, the observed rate of isolated SR was 1.0% (42 of 4669 patients). Taking into account these sources of incomplete follow-up, the actual rate of isolated SR was estimated to be 1.5-2%. This rate is slightly higher than the 0.5% reported by Halverson  in a study of 511 patients with Stage I or II breast carcinoma. Comparison with other published studies is hampered by differences among patient series with respect to tumor stage and treatment. Many (older) studies reported much higher rates of SR because they included relatively large proportions of patients with tumors larger than 5 cm or locally advanced breast carcinoma, or patients without axillary dissection; other studies were restricted to patients who underwent radical mastectomy or to patients with node-positive breast carcinoma. In addition, unlike the current study, most other studies were not restricted to isolated SR and instead included SR accompanying or following other distant metastases. In the current study, the median interval between first treatment for breast carcinoma and diagnosis of SR was 2.5 years, which is similar to the mean interval of 26 months reported by Hirn-Stadler

The prognosis for patients with SR was poor. The published 5-year overall survival rates for patients with isolated supraclavicular disease vary from 5% to 41%, with most reported values between 20% and 30 %. The prognoses for patients with supraclavicular metastases at first presentation and for patients with SR during the course of disease seem comparable, although the two groups are not clearly separated in most studies. In a previous analysis of 59 breast carcinoma patients with axillary recurrence after axillary clearance, 5-year overall survival and distant recurrence-free survival rates were 39%   and 35% , respectively. These rates are only slightly better than the rates for patients with SR in the current study. Fentiman  compared the survival of 35 patients with ipsilateral SR after radical mastectomy with the survival of patients with local skin recurrences; the survival rate for the former group fell between the rate for patients with 1 skin nodule and the rate for patients with multiple nodules. According to the results of the current study and others, tumor control of supraclavicular disease is not the main problem. Of the 42 patients in the current series, 35 (83%) achieved complete remission, and 12 of these 35 (34%) experienced local progression during the follow-up period; so in 23 of 42 patients (55%), a long-lasting, complete local remission was achieved. The main problem for patients with SR is the development of metastases at more distant sites. In the current study, the distant disease-free survival rate after 5 years was only 22%. This finding indicates that in most cases, isolated SR is a precursor of widespread disseminated disease. More than two-thirds of all patients developed bone metastases, and it appears likely that these metastases already were present at the time of diagnosis of SR. Routine evaluation of patients with SR using positron emission tomography, a sensitive technique for detecting bone metastases, may be able to protract the diagnosis of these metastases and therefore have a significant effect on treatment planning.

There are no specific guidelines for the treatment of patients with SR. Treatment is highly individualized and should be planned by a multidisciplinary team. In the current study, more than half of all patients underwent multimodality treatment involving some combination of surgery, radiotherapy, hormonal treatment, and/or chemotherapy. In the univariate analysis, use of radiotherapy showed a borderline significant association with development of metastases at more distant sites; i.e., patients with SR who received radiotherapy were less likely than those who did not to develop metastases at distant sites other than the supraclavicular region. One should note that this finding is based on a nonrandomized study and may be explained in part by differences in prognostic factors (e.g., prior irradiation) between those who received radiotherapy and those who did not. We therefore performed a separate analysis that excluded all patients who had received prior axillary and supraclavicular radiotherapy. Despite the limited number of patients in this analysis, the patients who received radiotherapy exhibited a significantly better distant recurrence-free survival rate than did patients who did not receive radiotherapy to treat SR. A favorable effect due to radiotherapy also was reported by Abraham   in a series of 20 consecutive women with SR who received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell support, significantly better progression-free survival was observed among the 11 patients who received consolidative radiotherapy to the involved supraclavicular region after transplantation. The median survival time for these patients was 37 months, similar to the median of 41 months in the current study.

The optimal treatment strategy for SR is not yet known. Radiotherapy leads to reasonable local control, but the value of systemic therapy is less clear. In the small randomized trial of Pergolizzi  which compared chemotherapy alone  with induction chemotherapy followed by radical radiotherapy  the 5-year overall survival rates were 17% and 36%, respectively . Another small trial reported better disease-free survival (but not better overall survival) after the addition of tamoxifen to radiotherapy in the treatment of breast carcinoma patients who predominantly had chest wall recurrences or skin metastases. Some authors recommend aggressive multimodality treatment because of the relatively small tumor burden associated with supraclavicular disease.Brito  from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, observed significantly better survival after multimodality treatment among 70 patients with solitary ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases at first presentation compared with patients with nonsupraclavicular metastatic disease. Due to concerns regarding undertreatment, Brito et al. advocated the inclusion of supraclavicular disease in the Stage III (rather than Stage IV) category. This recommendation was followed by the International Union Against Cancer in the most recent edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors; patients with metastases in supraclavicular lymph nodes now are classified as N3c/pN3c, and a new stage (Stage IIIC) that includes N3 (pN3a, pN3b, pN3c) M0 (any T-classification) has been introduced. In previous editions, these malignancies had been classified as distant metastases (M1; Stage IV disease).

Patients with SR have a poor prognosis, which probably is similar to the prognosis for patients with supraclavicular disease at first presentation of breast carcinoma. Nonetheless, the prognosis for patients with SR is slightly better than for patients with metastatic disease at other sites. Involved field radiotherapy, in addition to systemic treatment, appears to play an important role in achieving local control of disease and may improve the distant recurrence-free survival rate.


Supraclavicular nodal relapse of breast cancer: prevalence, palliation, and prognosis.

Ampil FL, Caldito G, Li BD, Burton GV.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(3-4):233-5. Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency, palliative effects of radiotherapy (RT) and survival of patients developing supraclavicular nodal relapse (SNR) after definitive surgery for non-disseminated breast cancer (BCa). METHODS: A retrospective study of individuals treated by breast conserving surgery or modified radical mastectomy for Stage I to III BCa at a single institution during a 17-year period (1980-96) was undertaken. RESULTS: Of the 536 patients studied, 22 (4%) developed SNR. Among the seven symptomatic women, the complete subjective response rate after RT was 71%. Of the 18 evaluable patients with manifest SNRs, tumor regression was complete in 12 (66.6%), partial in one (5.6%), and absent in five (27.8%). The overall median survival was 11.5 months; five patients (23%) survived for at least two years. CONCLUSION: Supraclavicular nodal relapse in breast cancer patients occurs infrequently. The application of radiotherapy for palliation of SNR was fully justified by the perceived results even though long-term survival was not often observed.

The supraclavicular recurrence of breast carcinoma

Hirn-Stadler B.  Strahlenther Onkol. 1990 Dec;166(12):774-7. Universitatsklinik fur Strahlentherapie und Strahlenbiologie Wien.

Between January 1970 and December 1978 39 patients with isolated supraclavicular recurrence of breast cancer were referred to the Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, University of Vienna. All patients have had mastectomy as primary treatment. In 46% of the patients a surgical excision of involved lymph node has been performed before irradiation. The median interval between mastectomy and supraclavicular recurrence was 26 months. The cumulative incidence after three years was 75%. 15 patients have shown complete local response during the whole follow-up time. In 38 patients, osseous and/or visceral metastasis were observed after a median interval of eight months. After two years, 87% of the patients presented distant disease. 15 patients suffered on local pain in the supraclavicular region or in the ipsilateral shoulder with lymph oedema of the arm. The median survival after therapy was 18 months. The death rate after three years was 77%. Patients with a recurrence-free interval after mastectomy less than two years had a median survival time of eleven months whereas patients with a recurrence-free interval had 26 months.

The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of supraclavicular lymph node metastasis after radical mastectomy

Yamada T, Morita K.  Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Feb 25;51(2):155-61.

Department of Radiotherapy, Aichi Cancer Center.

To define the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of supraclavicular lymph node (SCN) metastasis after initial surgery for breast cancer, a retrospective review of 55 patients with ipsilateral SCN metastasis after (extended) radical mastectomy was undertaken. In most cases, SCN metastasis is a manifestation of the systemic dissemination, because 87% of the patients developed second recurrence in 2 years after radiotherapy to SCN. However, the response to radiotherapy closely related to the survival after radiotherapy. 3 year-survival of the patients showing complete response was 42% while of the patients showing partial response was 9%. Six out of 34 mastectomized patients with sole SCN metastasis survived more than 3 years without evidence of recurrence following radiotherapy to SCN. It can be suggested that radiotherapy to SCN metastasis is not always palliative treatment, and has potency to improve the prognosis of the mastectomized patients. The prognostic factor of the patients with SCN metastasis was also referred. The time interval from initial surgery until SCN recurrence (disease free interval) has prognostic significance, because it indicates the natural course of each tumor. Presence of metastasis other than SCN at the time of first recurrence and poor response to radiotherapy predict worse prognosis.


Ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes metastases from breast cancer as only site of disseminated disease. Chemotherapy alone vs. induction chemotherapy to radical radiation therapy.

Pergolizzi S, Ann Oncol. 2001 Aug;12(8):1091-5.   

Institute of Radiological Science, Department of Radiation Oncology University of Messina, Italy. pergoste@solnet.it

BACKGROUND: To define the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph-nodes metastases (ISLM) from breast cancer as only site of disseminated disease, we started a prospective non-randomized clinical trial in 1989. Here we report the final results with a median follow-up of 8.75 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (pts), with ISLM from breast cancer, were consecutively enrolled into two arms. Arm A (18 pts): chemotherapy (CT) for six courses. Arm B (19 pts): CT for three courses followed by RT to the site of ISLM at 'radical' dose of 50-60 Gy. RESULTS: In arm A, a median Time to Progression (TtP) of 7 months with a median Overall Survival (OS) of 28 months was recorded. In comparison, patients in arm B had a longer median TtP with 20 months as well as a better median OS with 41 months, respectively. An actuarial five-year disease-free survival of 5.5% was obtained in arm A vs. 21% in arm B. A statistically significant difference in TtP was demonstrated between the two groups (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that a better event-free survival could be achieved in patients with ISLM submitted to induction CT and radical irradiation. This also translated into a longer survival although this did not achieve statistical significance. We want to stress the importance of local control by RT since it does imply that not all of these patients have micrometastases at the time of relapse in the supraclavicular foss

High dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell support in women with breast carcinoma and isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastases
Rick Abraham,  Cancer 2000;88:790-5.

The prognosis of patients with isolated supraclavicular lymph node (SCN) metastases is similar to patients with metastatic breast carcinoma involving other sites. Because these patients have a lower disease burden compared with women with distant metastases, their outcome after high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) may be superior.

The authors evaluated event free survival (EFS) and overall survival in a series of 20 consecutive women with SCN metastases as the only site of metastatic disease who were treated with HDCT and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation at The Toronto Hospital. All patients had responded to 4-6 cycles of induction CT using either an anthracycline-containing regimen or a single agent taxane, and received intensive therapy comprised of mitoxantrone, 64 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide, 6000 mg/m2; and carboplatin, 800-2000 mg/m2, each divided over 4 days followed by the infusion of autologous peripheral blood stem cells. Involved field radiation therapy (RT) was administered when possible after transplantation to the supraclavicular fossa and tamoxifen was given to previously untreated patients if they were hormone receptor positive or if their hormone receptor status was unknown. At a median follow-up of 28 months, 13 of the 20 women were alive, 11 of whom (55%) remained in continuous complete remission. There were no treatment-related deaths. The median overall survival was 37 months and the median progression free survival was 32 months from the date of transplantation. Consolidative RT was delivered to 11 women and on univariate analysis was found to be significantly associated with better EFS The long term outcome of women with breast carcinoma and isolated SCN metastases whose disease is sensitive to CT appears to be favorable; whether this result is superior to that achieved with standard therapy alone remains to be confirmed in prospective, randomized trials.