Detection, treatment, and outcome of isolated
supraclavicular recurrence in 42 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. van der Sangen MJ, Coebergh JW, Roumen RM, Rutten HJ, Vreugdenhil G, Voogd AC. Cancer. 2003 Jul 1;98(1):11-7. Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. |
BACKGROUND: There still is debate as to whether breast carcinoma patients with isolated supraclavicular recurrence should be considered to be patients with disseminated disease or patients for whom aggressive treatment with curative intent is justified. METHODS: In the period 1984-1994, 4669 patients with invasive breast carcinoma underwent axillary dissection in 1 of 8 community hospitals in the southeastern part of the Netherlands. During follow-up, 42 patients with isolated supraclavicular recurrence, without other sites of distant disease, were identified. RESULTS: The median interval between treatment of the primary tumor and diagnosis of the supraclavicular recurrence was 2.5 years (range, 0.2-11.5 years). Radiotherapy was administered to 25 patients (60%), 5 of whom also underwent surgery and 16 of whom also received chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Eleven patients received hormonal therapy only, and four received chemotherapy only. One patient received surgical treatment only, and one patient remained untreated. Complete remission was achieved in 35 patients (83%), but a second supraclavicular recurrence occurred in 12 (34% of patients who achieved complete remission). Overall, 6 patients (14%) were alive without evidence of disease after a follow-up period of 4.4-8.3 years. The 5-year actuarial overall survival and distant disease-free survival rates, based on the date of diagnosis of supraclavicular recurrence, were 38% and 22% respectively. The distant disease-free survival rate was somewhat better for the 25 patients who underwent radiotherapy as part of the treatment for supraclavicular recurrence than it was for the 17 patients who did not receive radiotherapy (P = 0.06); the difference became more pronounced after the exclusion of 8 patients who had received axillary and supraclavicular radiotherapy as part of treatment for the primary tumor (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although complete remission can be obtained in most patients with isolated supraclavicular recurrence, the prognosis for these patients is poor. Involved field radiotherapy appears to play an important role in the treatment of supraclavicular recurrence and may improve the distant recurrence-free survival rate. In the current study, the observed rate of isolated SR was 1.0% (42 of 4669 patients). Taking into account these sources of incomplete follow-up, the actual rate of isolated SR was estimated to be 1.5-2%. This rate is slightly higher than the 0.5% reported by Halverson in a study of 511 patients with Stage I or II breast carcinoma. Comparison with other published studies is hampered by differences among patient series with respect to tumor stage and treatment. Many (older) studies reported much higher rates of SR because they included relatively large proportions of patients with tumors larger than 5 cm or locally advanced breast carcinoma, or patients without axillary dissection; other studies were restricted to patients who underwent radical mastectomy or to patients with node-positive breast carcinoma. In addition, unlike the current study, most other studies were not restricted to isolated SR and instead included SR accompanying or following other distant metastases. In the current study, the median interval between first treatment for breast carcinoma and diagnosis of SR was 2.5 years, which is similar to the mean interval of 26 months reported by Hirn-Stadler The prognosis for patients with SR was poor. The published 5-year overall survival rates for patients with isolated supraclavicular disease vary from 5% to 41%, with most reported values between 20% and 30 %. The prognoses for patients with supraclavicular metastases at first presentation and for patients with SR during the course of disease seem comparable, although the two groups are not clearly separated in most studies. In a previous analysis of 59 breast carcinoma patients with axillary recurrence after axillary clearance, 5-year overall survival and distant recurrence-free survival rates were 39% and 35% , respectively. These rates are only slightly better than the rates for patients with SR in the current study. Fentiman compared the survival of 35 patients with ipsilateral SR after radical mastectomy with the survival of patients with local skin recurrences; the survival rate for the former group fell between the rate for patients with 1 skin nodule and the rate for patients with multiple nodules. According to the results of the current study and others, tumor control of supraclavicular disease is not the main problem. Of the 42 patients in the current series, 35 (83%) achieved complete remission, and 12 of these 35 (34%) experienced local progression during the follow-up period; so in 23 of 42 patients (55%), a long-lasting, complete local remission was achieved. The main problem for patients with SR is the development of metastases at more distant sites. In the current study, the distant disease-free survival rate after 5 years was only 22%. This finding indicates that in most cases, isolated SR is a precursor of widespread disseminated disease. More than two-thirds of all patients developed bone metastases, and it appears likely that these metastases already were present at the time of diagnosis of SR. Routine evaluation of patients with SR using positron emission tomography, a sensitive technique for detecting bone metastases, may be able to protract the diagnosis of these metastases and therefore have a significant effect on treatment planning. There are no specific guidelines for the treatment of patients with SR. Treatment is highly individualized and should be planned by a multidisciplinary team. In the current study, more than half of all patients underwent multimodality treatment involving some combination of surgery, radiotherapy, hormonal treatment, and/or chemotherapy. In the univariate analysis, use of radiotherapy showed a borderline significant association with development of metastases at more distant sites; i.e., patients with SR who received radiotherapy were less likely than those who did not to develop metastases at distant sites other than the supraclavicular region. One should note that this finding is based on a nonrandomized study and may be explained in part by differences in prognostic factors (e.g., prior irradiation) between those who received radiotherapy and those who did not. We therefore performed a separate analysis that excluded all patients who had received prior axillary and supraclavicular radiotherapy. Despite the limited number of patients in this analysis, the patients who received radiotherapy exhibited a significantly better distant recurrence-free survival rate than did patients who did not receive radiotherapy to treat SR. A favorable effect due to radiotherapy also was reported by Abraham in a series of 20 consecutive women with SR who received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell support, significantly better progression-free survival was observed among the 11 patients who received consolidative radiotherapy to the involved supraclavicular region after transplantation. The median survival time for these patients was 37 months, similar to the median of 41 months in the current study. The optimal treatment strategy for SR is not yet known. Radiotherapy leads to reasonable local control, but the value of systemic therapy is less clear. In the small randomized trial of Pergolizzi which compared chemotherapy alone with induction chemotherapy followed by radical radiotherapy the 5-year overall survival rates were 17% and 36%, respectively . Another small trial reported better disease-free survival (but not better overall survival) after the addition of tamoxifen to radiotherapy in the treatment of breast carcinoma patients who predominantly had chest wall recurrences or skin metastases. Some authors recommend aggressive multimodality treatment because of the relatively small tumor burden associated with supraclavicular disease.Brito from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, observed significantly better survival after multimodality treatment among 70 patients with solitary ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases at first presentation compared with patients with nonsupraclavicular metastatic disease. Due to concerns regarding undertreatment, Brito et al. advocated the inclusion of supraclavicular disease in the Stage III (rather than Stage IV) category. This recommendation was followed by the International Union Against Cancer in the most recent edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors; patients with metastases in supraclavicular lymph nodes now are classified as N3c/pN3c, and a new stage (Stage IIIC) that includes N3 (pN3a, pN3b, pN3c) M0 (any T-classification) has been introduced. In previous editions, these malignancies had been classified as distant metastases (M1; Stage IV disease). Patients with SR have a poor prognosis, which probably is similar to the prognosis for patients with supraclavicular disease at first presentation of breast carcinoma. Nonetheless, the prognosis for patients with SR is slightly better than for patients with metastatic disease at other sites. Involved field radiotherapy, in addition to systemic treatment, appears to play an important role in achieving local control of disease and may improve the distant recurrence-free survival rate.
The supraclavicular recurrence of breast carcinoma The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of supraclavicular lymph
node metastasis after radical mastectomy
High dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell support in women with
breast carcinoma and isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastases |