Phase III comparison of twice-daily split-course irradiation versus once-daily irradiation for patients with limited stage small-cell lung carcinoma.

Bonner JA,

Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation,

Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer were entered onto a phase III trial, and all patients initially received three cycles of etoposide (130 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). Subsequently, patients who did not have progression to a distant site (other than brain) were randomized to twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TDTI) versus once-daily thoracic irradiation (ODTI) given concomitantly with two additional cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). The irradiation doses were TDTI, 48 Gy in 32 fractions, with a 2.5-week break after the initial 24 Gy, and ODTI, 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. After thoracic irradiation, the patients received a sixth cycle of etoposide/cisplatin, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (30 Gy/15 fractions) if they had a complete response. RESULTS: Of 311 assessable patients enrolled in the trial, 262 underwent randomization to TDTI or ODTI. Similarly, overall survival was not different for the two treatment groups (P = .44). The 2- and 3-year survival rates were 47% and 34% for the once-daily arm and 45% and 29% for the twice-daily arm, respectively. There were no differences between the two treatments with respect to local-only progression rates, overall progression rates, or overall survival.

J Clin Oncol 2000 Apr;18(8):1662-7

Phase II trial of up-front accelerated thoracic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and optional up-front prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited small-cell lung cancer. Groupe d'Oncologie Thoracique des Regions Alpines.

Hugli A, Moro D, Mermillod B, Bolla M, Alberto P, Bonnefoi H, Miralbell R

Hopitaux Universitaires, Geneva, Switzerland. Anne.Huegli@hcuge.ch

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and outcome of bifractionated, up-front thoracic radiotherapy (TR) (45 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.5 Gy twice daily over 3 weeks) combined with chemotherapy (CT) (six cycles of cisplatin and etoposide) and optional low-dose, up-front prophylactic cranial irradiation (18 Gy in 10 fractions of 1.8 Gy twice daily over 5 days) in limited small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CT (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) for 3 days and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) for 3 days) was started on day 8 or 15 after the first TR treatment. In the five subsequent cycles, cisplatin was given as a single 100-mg/m(2) dose on day 1 every 4 weeks. A total of 52 patients were entered (41 men and 11 women); the median age was 55 years (range, 33 to 67 years). Thirty-one patients (60%) achieved a complete response, and 16 (30%) had a partial response. One-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 84%), 34% (95% CI, 21% to 49%), and 32% (95 CI, 16% to 46%), respectively. The median survival time was 18 months. Event-free survival at 1 year was 45% (95% CI, 32% to 58%) and at 3 years, 30% (95% CI, 18% to 44%). The main radiation-related acute toxicity was esophageal: 38% of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. CT was well tolerated. Although grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 86% of the patients, only 4% presented with associated fever. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting was seen in 35% of patients. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates that up-front accelerated TR associated with CT is feasible, has acceptable toxicity, and shows considerable long-term survival potential.

N Engl J Med 1999 Jan 28;340(4):265-71

Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide.

Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, Sause WT, Livingston RB, Komaki R, Wagner H, Aisner S, Johnson DH

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA. turrisi@radonc.musc.edu

BACKGROUND: For small-cell lung cancer confined to one hemithorax (limited small-cell lung cancer), thoracic radiotherapy improves survival, but the best ways of integrating chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy remain unsettled. Twice-daily accelerated thoracic radiotherapy has potential advantages over once-daily radiotherapy. METHODS: We studied 417 patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. All the patients received four 21-day cycles of cisplatin plus etoposide. We randomly assigned these patients to receive a total of 45 Gy of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy, given either twice daily over a three-week period or once daily over a period of five weeks. RESULTS: Twice-daily treatment beginning with the first cycle of chemotherapy significantly improved survival as compared with concurrent once-daily radiotherapy (P=0.04 by the log-rank test). After a median follow-up of almost 8 years, the median survival was 19 months for the once-daily group and 23 months for the twice-daily group. The survival rates for patients receiving once-daily radiotherapy were 41 percent at two years and 16 percent at five years. For patients receiving twice-daily radiotherapy, the survival rates were 47 percent at two years and 26 percent at five years. Grade 3 esophagitis was significantly more frequent with twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy, occurring in 27 percent of patients, as compared with 11 percent in the once-daily group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Four cycles of cisplatin plus etoposide and a course of radiotherapy (45 Gy, given either once or twice daily) beginning with cycle 1 of the chemotherapy resulted in overall two- and five-year survival rates of 44 percent and 23 percent, a considerable improvement in survival rates over previous results in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer.

Clin Oncol 1997 Mar;15(3):893-900

Initial versus delayed accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study.

Jeremic B, Shibamoto Y, Acimovic L, Milisavljevic S

Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Kragujevac, Yugoslavia.

PURPOSE: To perform a randomized study of the optimal timing of thoracic radiation (RT) as accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (ACC HFX RT) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy (CHT) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1992, 107 patients were enrolled and 103 were assessable. All patients received ACC HFX RT with 1.5 Gy twice daily to 54 Gy plus concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide (C/E) (30 mg each) and four sequential cycles of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) (30 mg/m2 and 120 mg/m2, respectively, on days 1 to 3). Group I patients (n = 52) received concurrent chemoradiation at weeks 1 to 4, and group II (n = 51) at weeks 6 to 9. Patients who showed a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) underwent prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) at weeks 16 to 17. RESULTS: The median survival time was 34 months in group I and 26 months in group II, and the Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival rates were 30% and 15%, respectively. The difference was almost significant on univariate analysis (P = .052) and was significant on multivariate analysis (P = .027). Group I patients had a significantly higher local control rate than group II patients, but there was no difference between the two groups in distant metastasis rate. There was no difference in the incidence of acute or late grade 3 to 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Initial administration of thoracic ACC HFX RT with concurrent C/E seems to produce better local control and survival rates than delayed administration.

J Clin Oncol 1996 Mar;14(3):806-13

Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent twice-daily chest radiotherapy and etoposide/cisplatin followed by cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine.

Johnson BE,

National Cancer Institute-Navy Medical Oncology,

PURPOSE: A phase II trial in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with induction etoposide/cisplatin plus twice-daily chest radiotherapy was conducted in an attempt to increase response rates and prolong survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four previously untreated patients with limited-stage small-cell cancer were treated with etoposide/cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy at 1.5 Gy twice daily for 3 weeks to a total dose of 45 Gy. Patients then received three more cycles of etoposide/cisplatin followed by four cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide or an individualized chemotherapy regimen. RESULTS: Nine patients are alive and free of cancer a median of 4 years (range, 2 to 7) from the start of treatment. Thirty-eight have had progression of their cancer at a median of 1.2 years (range, 0.5 to 5.4) and all have died of small-cell cancer. Thirteen of these 38 patients' (34%) only site of initial relapse was in the CNS and all died of CNS metastases. Five patients died during therapy or from its complications and two patients died of causes other than relapsed small-cell lung cancer and toxicity. The median survival time is 21.3 months, with an actual survival rate of 83% at 1 year, and actuarial survival rates of 43% at 2 years and 19% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: This combined modality regimen for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer results in a 2-year survival rate of 43%, but the principal cause of death in these patients is still relapse of the original cancer. Isolated CNS metastases caused more than 30% of the cancer deaths.