Results with External Beam Radiation

orb.gif (28771 bytes)

 

 

 

 

prostate_horwitz.gif (6977 bytes)  

 

As noted elsewhere the results for prostate cancer may be better when external beam therapy is given using 3D Conformal therapy or IMRT so higher doses can now be safely given (at least 75Gy) (see Katin nomogram for results) or when a seed implant is combined with external. There is also evidence that for more advanced stages, combining radiation with hormones will improve results.

Survival after Radiation for Prostate Cancer (old data)
Stage 5y 10y 15y
A or T1 57-63% 40 - 60% 35%
B or T2 45 - 47% 25 - 55% 33%
C or T3 33 - 35% 23 - 35% 18%

Stanford and Patterns of Care Data from DeVita 1993:1098

 
Prior to the use of PSA it was assumed that most patients treated with standard conventional radiation were cured.Now it is apparent that many of these patients were not cured because their PSA never fell below 1.0 or after a few years the PSA started rising. At the present time there is no consensus on what to do for a patient whose PSA starts rising years after radiation, since most of these men do well without any further treatment. nevertheless they are not considered 'officially cured' if their PSA dose not fall below 1 and stay there.
 

Results at 5 Years for Prostate Cancer and Radiation

Stage Alive Clinically Cured PSA Cured
T1 85% 81% 62%
T2 82% 74% 53%
T3 66% 55% 34%

J Clin Onc 1995;13:464

                   as noted elsewhere the control rate depends heavily on the PSA the Gleason score prior to radiation as noted:

Radiation Results based on Gleason Score and PSA

Gleason Cure PSA Cure
2 - 4 63% < 4 90%
5 - 6 45% 4 - 10 54%
7 20% 10 - 15 31%
8 - 10 24% 15 - 20 24%
    > 20 14%

Series of 480 and dose 66.6Gy IJROBP 1996;36:565

 

PSA Cures based on PSA level (prior to treatment) and Gleason Score (GS)
PSA GS 2-4 GS 5-6 GS 7 GS 8-10 All
0 - 3.9 89% 86% 86% 75% 86%
4.0 - 9.9 75% 68% 50% 37% 62%
10 - 19.9 59% 54% 29% 18% 44%
20 + 38% 17% 16% 16% 18%
All 71% 55% 37% 25% 50%

Series of 871 men treated with conventional external beam (66.6Gy) from Kestin Cancer 1999;86:1557

 
So the results using PSA scores show the cure rate with radiation is not as good as originally thought, though probably the same as surgery if you compare patients with the same level of PSA prior to treatment as noted:

PSA Cured Based on Therapy and PSA Level Prior to Treatment

PSA Radical Prostatectomy Radiation
0 - 4 92 - 95% 91%
4 - 10 83 - 93% 69 - 85%
IJROBP 1996;35:245
 
Patients with prostate cancer who elect to have radiation therapy should be treated with conformal 3D therapy and if the cancer is advanced (Gleason score over 6 or PSA over 10) they should consider combining the external beam radiation with either seed implantation, hormonal therapy or both.