[Dosimetry comparison of irradiation with conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, conformal radiotherapy in stereotactic conditions and robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for benign brain tumours.]

[Article in French]
Spasic E, 2011 Jun 9. Cancer Radiother. 2011 Jun 9. [Epub ahead of print] French. [Epub ahead of print]

Source

Département de radiophysique, centre Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, France;
 

To compare several techniques in order to determine the best treatment for benign brain tumours.

A retrospective study was performed for five patients who received 3D-conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy or CyberKnife(®). These patients had a meningioma, a pituitary tumour, a craniopharyngioma or a neurinoma. In each case, these treatment plans were optimised and compared with the three other dosimetries. Radiobiological or positioning parameters were evaluated, as well as dosimetric parameters, in order to compare treatments with different characteristics.

RESULTS:

The dosimetric parameters showed that the choice of treatment seemed to be determined mostly by tumour size, shape and proximity with organs at risk (not tumour localisation). Whereas the results showed no significant deviations with regards to the radiobiological parameters. Therefore, with these parameters, it was difficult to give priority to a treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

With regards to benign brain tumours of medium or large size, intensity modulated radiotherapy seemed the recommended treatment. It enabled to obtain a good ratio between efficacy and toxicity for tumours that are really close to organs at risk. Concerning small benign brain tumours, the CyberKnife(®) was probably the best treatment.

 

Significance of tumor volume related to peritumoral edema in intracranial meningioma treated with extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in three to five fractions.

Morimoto M, Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011 May;41(5):609-16. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. morimoto-knk@umin.ac.jp

To investigate the treatment results of intracranial meningiomas treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in three to five fractions.

METHODS:

Thirty-one patients (32 lesions) with intracranial meningioma were treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in three to five fractions using CyberKnife. Fifteen lesions were diagnosed as Grade I (World Health Organization classification) by surgical resection and 17 lesions were diagnosed as meningioma based on radiological findings. The median follow-up time was 48 months. The median planning target volume was 6.3 cm(3) (range, 1.4-27.1), and the prescribed dose (D90≤) ranged from 21 to 36 Gy (median, 27.8) administrated in three to five fractions.

RESULTS:

Five-year overall and progression-free survival rate of all 31 patients with intracranial meningioma was 86 and 83%, respectively. Five-year progression-free rate of all 32 lesions was 87%. Six of the 31 patients (19%) developed marked peritumoral edema, three of whom were asymptomatic and three symptomatic, the latter with late adverse effects of more than or equal to Grade 3.

The mean planning target volume of the six lesions with marked peritumoral edema was 15.6 cm(3), and for the remaining 26 lesions without marked peritumoral edema was 7.1 cm(3) (P = 0.004). The threshold diameter of 2.56 cm for meningioma was calculated from the planning target volume (11 cm(3)) and was used as marker of developing peritumoral edema (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS:

Tumor volume is a significant indicative factor for peritumoral edema in intracranial meningioma treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in three to five factions.

Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of atypical (WHO grade II) cranial meningiomas.

Choi CY      Neurosurgery. 2010 Nov;67(5):1180-8.
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA. cyhchoi@stanford.edu

The optimal management of subtotally resected atypical meningiomas is unknown.

OBJECTIVE:

To perform a retrospective review of patients with residual or recurrent atypical meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS:

Twenty-five patients were treated, either immediately after surgery (n = 15) or at the time of radiographic progression or treatment failure (n = 10). SRS was delivered to with a median marginal dose of 22 Gy (range, 16-30) in 1 to 4 fractions (median, 1), targeting a median tumor volume of 5.3 cm³ (range, 0.3-26.0).

RESULTS:

With a median follow-up time of 28 months (range, 3-67), the 12-, 24-, and 36-month actuarial local and regional control rates for all patients were 94%, 94%, 74%, and 90%, 90%, 62%, respectively. There were 2 cases of radiation toxicity. On univariate analysis, the number of recurrences before SRS (P = .046), late SRS (ie, waiting until tumor progression to initiate treatment) (P = .03), and age at treatment ≥ 60 years (P = .01) were significant predictors of recurrence. Of the 20 radiation-naïve patients, 2 patients failed with the targeted lesion and 3 elsewhere in the resection bed, resulting in 12-, 24- and 36-month actuarial local and regional control rates of 100%, 100%, 73% and 93%, 93%, 75%, respectively. The overall locoregional control rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 93%, 93%, and 54%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Irradiation of the entire postoperative tumor bed may not be necessary for the majority of patients with subtotally resected atypical meningiomas. Patients in this series achieved outcomes comparable to that of historical control rates for larger volume, conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.

Predictors of peritumoral edema after stereotactic radiosurgery of supratentorial meningiomas.

Patil CG  Neurosurgery. 2008 Sep;63(3):435-40; discussion 440-2.
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Hospital,Stanford, California 94305, USA. chiragpatil@gmail.com

Anecdotal evidence suggests that radiosurgical ablation of parasagittal meningiomas may be associated with increased risk of subsequent edema. Potential predictors of postradiosurgical peritumoral edema, including parasagittal tumor location, tumor size, and treatment dose, were evaluated.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed records of 102 patients with 111 supratentorial meningiomas treated with CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A median marginal dose of 18.0 Gy (range, 11.3-25.0 Gy) was delivered in 1 to 5 sessions (fractions). Potential predictors of posttreatment symptomatic edema were evaluated using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS:

Of the 102 patients followed for a mean of 20.9 months (range, 6-77 mo), 15 (14.7%) developed symptomatic edema after SRS. Nine of 31 with parasagittal meningiomas (29.0%) and 6 of 80 with nonparasagittal supratentorial meningiomas (7.5%) developed symptomatic edema (P = 0.0053).

Compared with patients with meningiomas in nonmidline supratentorial locations, patients with parasagittal meningiomas were more than 4 times as likely to develop symptomatic edema after SRS (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-11.5). The 6-, 12-, and 18-month actuarial rates of symptomatic edema development were significantly greater for patients with parasagittal meningiomas than for patients with nonparasagittal meningiomas (17.8 versus 1.3%, 25.4 versus 5.8%, and 35.2 versus 7.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Patients with parasagittal meningiomas are at greater risk of developing peritumoral symptomatic edema after SRS. Close follow-up after SRS may be particularly important in such patients. These results highlight the need to pursue strategies that could decrease the incidence of postradiosurgical edema in patients with parasagittal meningioma.