Benefits of Radiation for Renal Cell (Kidney) Cancer
kidney_small.jpg (5720 bytes) The role of radiation in renal cell cancer remains somewhat controversial, as discussed below. Specific studies on the role of postoperative radiation are discussed here and studies using radiation to treat metastatic renal cell cancer are discussed here.

Adenocarcinoma of the kidney is a radiosensitive neoplasm.  Clinical experiences demonstrated very good subjective and objective response rates in patients receiving palliative irradiation for symptomatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Despite the favorable effect that irradiation has against this neoplasm in advanced disease, it has not convincingly improved the results of patients treated in an adjuvant setting for early-stage disease.

Historically, several retrospective series suggested a clinical benefit to adjuvant radiation therapy for renal cell carcinoma. Two European studies were undertaken to test the efficacy of preoperative radiation therapy in renal cell cancer. A prospective randomized study of preoperative irradiation and nephrectomy versus nephrectomy was conducted in Rotterdam. No advantage was demonstrated in patients receiving radiation therapy with respect to overall survival or survival free of distant metastasis. In Sweden, a second prospective randomized clinical trial was also unable to demonstrate an advantage to patients receiving preoperative radiation therapy.

Postoperative radiation therapy was reported to be beneficial in early retrospective studies. Two prospective randomized studies testing the value of postoperative irradiation did not demonstrate an advantage to patients receiving radiation therapy after surgery. The four prospective randomized trials that have studied the effects of adjuvant radiation therapy seem to argue convincingly against its routine use in patients with renal cell carcinoma. There are some circumstances in which radiation therapy should be considered as part of the curative treatment for renal cell carcinoma. Radiation therapy has increased the resectability of locally advanced tumors in both prospective and retrospective series. The lack of benefit from postoperative irradiation in the prospective clinical trials may be explained by poor patient selection and radiation therapy technique. A retrospective review from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center of 172 patients treated by radical nephrectomy demonstrated an overall local failure rate of only 5%. The majority of patients in this series had T1 or T2 tumors. Patients with lymph node metastases or positive margins had a significantly higher local failure rate of 21%, compared with 4% in patients without these bad prognostic features. This suggests that if a benefit from postoperative irradiation exists, it would be demonstrable only in patients with pathologic features that would increase their risk of local failure. Early-stage tumors have an extremely good local control rate, and therefore radiation therapy would not be expected to play a beneficial role in patients with these tumors.

Kao and associates reported that, in a retrospective series, 12 patients with high-risk, locally advanced tumors with perinephric invasion or surgically positive margins had a 100% local control rate if treated adjuvantly with postoperative irradiation. Patients received 41.4 to 63 Gy in 1.8- to 2-Gy fractions. The 5-year local failure rate was 30% in a comparable group of patients treated by surgery only during this same period Another retrospective series demonstrated that 37 patients with T3 tumors had a statistically significant lower local failure rate (10%) when given postoperative irradiation, compared with 30 similar patients undergoing nephrectomy alone (37%).  Patients received a median dose of 46 Gy in 1.8- to 2-Gy fractions; CT-assisted treatment planning was used in most patients. Recent retrospective series have suggested a benefit to postoperative radiation therapy in patients selected because of a high risk of local recurrence.

Based on this collection of both prospective and retrospective data, the following indications for adjuvant radiation therapy should be considered: (1) unresectable nonmetastatic tumors (preoperative irradiation); (2) incomplete resection with gross or microscopically positive margins; (3) locally advanced tumor with perinephric fat extension or adrenal invasion (T3a or T3c) -- renal vein or inferior vena cava involvement alone (T3b) does not necessarily increase the risk of local recurrence and should not be considered an indication for radiation therapy; or (4) lymph node metastases. Lymph node metastases are associated with both a high rate of distant metastasis and local failure. Although radiation therapy may decrease the local recurrence rate, an improvement in overall survival may not be demonstrated in this circumstance. Read some of the studies