|
To boost or not to
boost?
A recent study (Bartelink; NEJM 2001;345:1378) is noted below.
Other studies show the greatest benefit from a boost is in the younger women
(go here). |
Variable | No Boost Radiation | Boost Radiation Given |
Age | ||
< 40 y | 19.5% | 10.2% |
41 - 50y | 9.5% | 5.8% |
51 - 60y | 4.2% | 3.4% |
>60y | 4% | 2.5% |
Menopausal status | ||
Premenopausal | 10.3% | 6.8% |
Postmenopausal | 4.6% | 2.8% |
Tumor stage | ||
T1 | 5.9% | 4.0% |
T2 | 7.8% | 4.5% |
DCIS | ||
absent | 5.4% | 3.5% |
present | 9.3% | 5.6% |
Results During a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, local recurrences were observed in 182 of the 2657 patients in the standard-treatment group and 109 of the 2661 patients in the additional-radiation group. The five-year actuarial rates of local recurrence were 7.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6.8 to 7.6 percent) and 4.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3.8 to 4.7 percent), respectively (P<0.001), yielding a hazard ratio for local recurrence of 0.59 (99 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.81) associated with an additional dose. Patients 40 years old or younger benefited most; at five years, their rate of local recurrence was 19.5 percent with standard treatment and 10.2 percent with additional radiation (hazard ratio, 0.46 [99 percent confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.89]; P=0.002). At five years in the age group 41 to 50 years old, no differences were found in rates of metastasis or overall survival (which were 87 and 91 percent, respectively). Overall, 47 percent of the local recurrences occurred in the primary tumor bed, 9 percent in the scar, and 29 percent outside the area of the original tumor, and 27 percent were diffuse throughout the breast |