Meta-Analysis of Breast Cancer Outcomes in Adjuvant Trials of Aromatase Inhibitors Versus TamoxifenJournal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 28, No 3 (January 20), 2010: pp. 509-518
|
Purpose To conduct meta-analyses of randomized trials of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) compared with tamoxifen either as initial monotherapy (cohort 1) or after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen (cohort 2).
Materials and Methods Data submitted to the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group were used in separate meta-analyses of two cohorts. Primary analyses involve postmenopausal women with tumors reported to be estrogen receptor positive. Log-rank P values are two-sided.
Results Cohort 1
comprised 9,856 patients with a mean of 5.8 years of follow-up. At 5
years, AI therapy was associated with an
absolute 2.9% decrease in recurrence (9.6% for AI v 12.6%
for tamoxifen) and a nonsignificant absolute
1.1% decrease in breast cancer mortality
(4.8% for AI v 5.9% for tamoxifen).
Cohort 2 comprised 9,015 patients with a mean of 3.9 years of
follow-up. At 3 years from treatment divergence (ie, approximately 5
years after starting hormonal treatment), AI therapy was associated
with an absolute 3.1% decrease in recurrence (5.0% for AI v 8.1%
for tamoxifen since divergence) and an absolute 0.7%
decrease in breast cancer mortality (1.7% for AI v 2.4% for tamoxifen
since divergence). There was no convincing heterogeneity in the
proportional recurrence reduction with respect to age, nodal status,
tumor grade, or progesterone receptor status and no indication of an
increase in nonbreast deaths with AIs in either cohort.
Conclusion AIs produce significantly lower recurrence rates compared with tamoxifen, either as initial monotherapy or after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen. Additional follow-up will provide clearer information on long-term survival.