The question arises as to whether Radio surgery is clearly better than whole brain irradiation, the RTOG randomized trial is designed to answer this and as reported at ASTRO 2002, survival is improved:
Stereotactic radiosurgery with whole brain radiation therapy improves survival in patients with brain metastases: report of radiation therapy oncology group phase III study 95–08. P.W. Sperduto ASTRO 2002

Purpose/Objective: To determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) after conventional whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) improves overall survival when compared to WBRT alone in patients with 1–3 brain metastases. Secondary objectives include a comparison of sites of recurrence and cause of death.

Materials/Methods: Between 1/96 and 6/01, 333 patients from 34 institutions were randomized to receive WBRT + SRS or WBRT alone. The WBRT was given at 250cGy/fraction to 3750 cGy in 3 weeks. The SRS dose was based on tumor size and was delivered within one week of completion of WBRT. The study was designed to detect a 50% improvement in median survival time (MST) with 80% statistical power for all patients and a 75% improvement in MST in patients with solitary metastases. Central radiology review of local control and salvage therapy analyses will be presented.

Results: There was a statistically significant survival advantage with WBRT + SRS for the following patients: solitary brain metastases (MST 6.5 vs 4.9 months, P=0.04), RPA class I (MST 11.6 vs 9.6 months, P=0.05), age < 50 (9.9 vs 8.3 months, P=0.04) and patients with non-small cell lung cancer or any squamous cell carcinoma (5.9 vs 3.9 months, P=0.05). Also, patients with initial KPS of 90–100 appeared to benefit (10.2 vs 7.4 months) without reaching statistical significance (p=0.07). Furthermore, all patients in the WBRT + SRS group were more likely to have a stable or improved performance status (KPS) at 3 months (50% vs 33%, P=0.02) and at 6 months (43% vs 27%, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in cause of death but there was a significant difference in local control as reported by the treating institution (82% vs 71% at one year for WBRT + SRS vs WBRT alone, respectively (p=0.01). Toxicities were comparable between the two treatment groups.

Conclusions: WBRT + SRS provided a survival advantage compared to WBRT alone in each of the following patient categories: 1) solitary brain metastasis; 2) RPA class I ; 3) age < 50; 4) non-small cell lung cancer or any squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, all subsets of patients in the WBRT + SRS group were more likely to have a stable or improved performance status than those in the WBRT alone group. Systemic disease remained the primary cause of death (>2/3) in both groups and improved systemic therapies are needed

RADIATION THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP

RTOG 95-08

A PHASE III TRIAL COMPARING WHOLE BRAIN IRRADIATION WITH VERSUS WITHOUT STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY BOOST FOR PATIENTS WITH ONE TO THREE UNRESECTED BRAIN METASTASES

Arm 1: Whole brain RT to 37.5 Gy/15 fractions/2.5 Gy once daily, 5 days/week followed by radiosurgery to all (1-3) metastase(i)s

Arm 2: Whole brain RT to 37.5 Gy/15 fractions/2.5 Gy once daily, 5 days/week

Arm 1: All patients will receive whole brain radiation therapy delivered to 37.5 Gy in 15 daily fractions of 2.5 Gy followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to all (1-3) known metastase(i)s. SRS dose will be tumor size dependent (See Section 6.2.2) and will be prescribed to the isodose surface (> 50% to < 90% of the maximum dose [maximum = 100%]) which encompasses the margin of the tumor.

Arm 2: All patients will receive whole brain radiation therapy delivered to 37.5 Gy in 15 daily fractions of 2.5 Gy.

3.1 Eligibility Criteria (6/14/99)

3.1.1 Histologically confirmed malignancy with the presence of one intraparenchymal brain metastases. Patients with solitary metastasis are eligible only if a) they have refused surgery or b) surgical resection is deemed inappropriate by the patient's physician.

3.1.2 A diagnostic contrast enhanced MRI demonstrating the presence of one unresected brain metastases performed within two weeks prior to registration.

3.1.3 The contrast-enhancing tumor must be well circumscribed and must have a maximum diameter of <= 4 .0 cm in any direction on the enhanced scan. If multiple lesions are present and one lesion is at the maximum diameter, the other(s) must not exceed 3.0 cm in maximum diameter (multiple sesions were discontinued 6/14/99) (delineate tumor under study by circling and numbering on the scan with wax pencil).

3.1.4 No previous cranial radiation.

6.0 RADIATION THERAPY

6.1 Whole Brain Radiation Therapy

6.1.1 Total Dose: Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) must begin within one week of randomization. One treatment of 2.5 Gy will be given daily 5 days a week for a total of 37.5 Gy. Both portals shall be treated during each treatment session. The WBRT regimen will be identical for both arms.

6.1.2 Physical factors: Treatment will be delivered using megavoltage machines with photon beams ranging from 4 to 8 MV. The minimum dose rate at the midplane in the brain on the central axis must be 0.50 Gy/minute. Electron, particle, or implant therapy is not permissible.

6.1.3 Simulation, Immobilization, Localization: The patient will be treated in the supine position. Adequate immobilization and reproducibility of position must be ensured. The target volume will cover the brain and the meninges to the foramen magnum.

6.1.4 Treatment Planning: Treatments must be delivered through parallel opposed fields that cover the entire cranial contents. There should be beam fall_off of at least 1 cm. The eyes will be excluded from the beam either by field arrangement or shielding.

6.1.5 Dose Specification: Doses will be specified at the central axis at midplane on the brain. For the following portal arrangments, the target dose shall be specified as follows:

6.1.5.1 For two opposed coaxial equally weighted beams: On the central ray at mid_separation of beams.

6.2 Radiosurgery (3/17/98)

6.2.1 Timing: Radiosurgery must be delivered within seven days of completion of whole brain radiation in Arm 1. Only those patients assigned to Arm 1 are eligible to receive SRS as a component of initial therapy. It is possible that at the time of radiosurgery, one of these scenarios occur:

An identified metastasis at the time of enrollment now exceeds the acceptable upper limit diameter (4.0 cm for a solitary metastasis, or 3.0 cm for multiple metastases). If any one metastasis exceeds the limit at the time of radiosurgery, the lesion should not be treated.

If a lesion disappears after the course of conventional radiation this lesion should not be targeted for radiosurgery.

If more than three lesions exist at the time of radiosurgery, radiosurgery should be delivered to the three largest treatable lesions that meet the eligibility criteria. The physicians submitting the films should circle and number (1-3) with wax pencil, each lesion so each lesion can be uniformly identified and teh response to treatment can be evaluated for each corresponding lesion.

6.2.2 Total Dose Determination: The total dose is dependent on the size of the metastastic lesion(s) as follows:

Maximum Tumor Diameter

2.0 cm
2.1-3.0 cm
3.1-4.0 cm

Assigned Dose

24 Gy
18 Gy
15 Gy

6.2.4 Target Volume Determination:

6.2.4.1 Target volume and isocenter determination will be based on a contrast enhanced CT scan with the patient's head in a stereotactic frame. The imaging study used to deliver the radiosurgical treatment must be the same as used to determine size of the metastatic lesion(s).

6.2.4.2 Stereotactic CT or MRI slice thickness may not exceed 3 mm.

6.2.4.3 The target volume will include the enhancing portion of the metastatic lesion. Surrounding areas of edema will not be considered part of the target volume.

6.2.5 Dose Prescription and Dosimetry Requirements

6.2.5.1 The dose will be prescribed to the isodose surface (50-90% [maximum = 100%]) which encompasses the margin of the metastasis, as defined by the imaging studies. The 100% (maximum) dose will be recorded for each patient. The prescription dose shall be delivered to the 50-90% (maximum = 100%) isodose surface, and is defined as the minimum dose to the target volume. The minimum dose shall be established by an examination of the dose distribution on each axial level on which the target volume has been defined, and/or by the target dose_volume histogram.

6.2.5.2

For patients with one, two, or three brain metastase(i)s, each lesion will be assigned to a SRS dose level according to its maximal diameter. If any two lesions are within 0.8 to 2 cm cm of each other, the intervening midplane dose will not exceed 13.0 Gy. This dose may represent a dose to each respective target that will be less than the dose prescription listed in Section 6.2.2. A second stipulation will involve size. If one lesion is > 3.0 cm the remaining two metastases may not exceed 3.0 cm each in diameter. This stipulation is designed to minimize toxicity in patients with larger volume multiple metastases. A review of patient and tumor criteria among patients entered into RTOG 91-04, a phase III trial for patients with unresected brain metastase(i)s, would suggest that the majority would meet the entry criteria of this trial.

6.4.2 Isodose QA

Three isodose lines should be submitted: the prescription isodose line, 90% of the prescription isodose line (not 90% of total dose) and 80% of the prescription isodose line, should be submitted.

6.4.3 Target Coverage QA

Per protocol: The submitted 90% isodose line (90% of the prescription dose, not total dose) completely encompasses target.

- Acceptable variation: 80% isodose line covers the target.

- Unacceptable deviation: 80% isodose line does not cover target.

6.4.4 Dose QA

- Per protocol: If the maximum dimension of the tumor is

> 2.0 cm: 24 Gy

1-3 cm: 18 GY

1-4 cm: 15 Gy

prescribed to the isodose line that encompasses the target.

- Unacceptable deviation: Anything else

6.4.5 Dose Homogeneity QA

The ratio of the maximum dose to the prescribed dose (MD/PD) is:

- Per protocol if < 2

- Acceptable variation if > 2 but < 2.5

- Unacceptable deviation if > 2.5.

6.4.6 Dose Conformity QA

The ratio of prescription isodose volume to the target volume (PI/TV) is:

- Per protocol if between 1.0 and 2.0


- Acceptable variation if > 0.9 but < 1.0 or >2.0 but < 3.5.

- Unacceptable deviation if > 3.5.

(The prescription isodose volume may be obtained from the dose volume histogram which must be submitted in tabular, not graphic, form or by measuring the area of the prescription isodose on sequential levels. See Appendix V.)

6.4.7 Overall Radiosurgery Q/A Score

The ration of prescription isodose volume to the target volume (PI/TV) is:

- Per protocol if no variations or deviations are scored.

- Acceptable if no variations are scored.

- Unacceptable if a deviation is scored.

BACKGROUND INFO:  Metastases to the cranium and intracranial contents are the most common malignancy affecting the brain.6, 8,33 Of these, parenchymal brain metastases are the most common symptomatic lesions. Autopsy series have shown that as many as 25% of patients who die of cancer will have intracranial metastases, involving brain substance in about 15%.33 The majority of patients with intraparenchymal metastases have only one or two metastases, 49% and 21%, respectively, and the remaining 30% three or more. Approximently 80% of brain metastases are located supratentorially.11

Standard treatment for brain metastasis(es) include glucocorticoids and external beam whole brain irradiation (WBRT) which effectively relieve symptoms and restore neurological function in most patients.34 Untreated patients have a median survival time (MST) of less than 7 weeks.7 Three prospective randomized trials involving more than 1800 patients conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) evaluated 9 different radiation doses and schedules.5 All doses up to 50 Gray (Gy) were equivalent with respect to toxicity, neurological improvement, and survival. Higher doses resulted in greater neurologic toxicity. MST of all patient subgroups were three to six months. Little difference was found between patients who received 20 Gy administered over one week and 40 Gy administered over four weeks. Furthermore, radiation boost treatment to the metastatic site did not improve on WBRT.17 Currently, 30 Gy of WBRT delivered in 10 fractions is considered standard treatment in the United States.

The most common cancers to metastasize to brain are lung and breast, 34 and 30%, respectively. Of the approximately 200,000 patients with these malignancies who will die each year, 124,000 will have brain metastases.6 The cause of death in almost 50% is persistence of lesions or recurrence following WBRT; however, 10 to 15% of patients will survive at least one year.4, 10, 29 These data, along with the fact that brain metastases are so frequently single, provide the rationale for the development of treatment modalities that exceed current palliative measures to actually improve patient survival.

Surgical resection of brain metastases is increasingly performed on patients with favorable prognostic factors, accessible lesion(s), and/or metastatic lesions from relatively radio_insensitive tumors such as renal cell carcinoma and melanoma.14, 17, 28, 34, 38 Since metastases are usually well demarcated from surrounding brain, complete removal with a minimum of morbidity and mortality is often possible. Relief of symptoms of intracranial hypertension and focal brain dysfunction has been demonstrated. Patient survival is also dependent on the extent of extracranial disease. For patients who have undergone removal of solitary brain metastases, the addition of WBRT has been shown to result in a lower incidence of brain recurrence.34 Intergroup #0124 was testing whether there is a major benefit with the addition of WBRT; however, this study closed due to poor accrual. Two prospective randomized trials in which surgical excision followed by radiation therapy compared to radiation therapy alone in patients with single metastases have been done.29, 39 Patchell and colleagues randomized patients with single metastases to either surgical excision followed by WBRT (25 pts) or biopsy followed by WBRT (23 pts). The MST of patients who underwent surgical resection rather than biopsy were 40 and 21 weeks, respectively; functional independent survival times were 38 and 8 weeks, respectively, and the intracranial recurrence rates 20 and 52%, respectively These results confirmed those of earlier uncontrolled studies showing the benefits of surgical resection.14, 29, 31 Vecht et al. randomized 63 patients to the same regimens with similar results. Bindal et al., in a retrospective analysis of 56 patients with multiple resected metastases, 50% of whom received WBRT, reported a MST equivalent to that of patients with a single resected metastasis but longer than that of patients who had one or more lesions remaining after surgery.4 Based on these reports, surgical removal in patients with a solitary accessible lesion followed by WBRT appears superior to WBRT alone for selected patients.

The post-operative delivery of WBRT for such patients is considered beneficial to sterilize residual disease in the tumor bed or other sites of occult disease in the brain. There are several retrospective studies involving relatively small numbers of patients in which surgery followed by WBRT has been compared to surgery alone.35,16,12 Smalley and colleagues demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival and fewer recurrences in 85 patients who received WBRT following surgery.35 In a second retrospective analysis by the same investigators, the MST among 229 patients was 15 months for those who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant WBRT as compared to 8 months for patients who underwent surgery but did not receive WBRT.36 On the other hand, Hagan et al. found no advantage to WBRT following surgery in patients with melanoma, a radioresistant tumor.16 Likewise, Dorsoretz et al. found no survival advantage to low dose WBRT among 33 patients with resected solitary lesions and no active systemic cancer.12

Recent reports have suggested a role for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of metastatic brain tumor.The recent development of linear accelerators modified to deliver focused irradiation has expanded the availability of SRS.Advantages of SRS are ease of administration from the patient's viewpoint (one_day treatment), the ability to treat metastases located in areas of the brain not amenable to complete surgical resection, and the potential to decrease neurosurgery and radiation related morbidity and mortality.SRS allows delivery of a high dose of focal irradiation in a single fraction to the tumor from multiple geometric positions Brain metastases are ideal targets for SRS because the majority are small (< 3 cm in diameter), most are spherical with distinct tumor margins on contrast enhanced imaging studies and most displace rather than infiltrate normal brain.3 SRS minimizes the amount of radiation received by the non-target regions of the brain, and the area targeted generally does not include functional brain.15,32

Retrospective analyses show that brain metastases from a large number of different types of malignancies including less radioresponsive malignancies such as colon cancer, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma respond to SRS.26,32 Local control to complete radiographic obliteration has been achieved in 80 to 90% of cases.32 Noordijk et al. treated 52 brain metastases in 33 patients with SRS.28 At 5.5 months follow up, 10 (29%) patients' metastatic lesions had completely disappeared, 15 (50%) had decreased in size and four had stable intracranial disease. Mehta et al. recently reported the results of a prospective trial in which patients with single brain metastasis were randomized to undergo surgical resection of the metastasis followed by SRS to the preoperative tumor margins and/or residual tumor or SRS alone25. MST for patients who received surgery and SRS was 40 weeks compared to 15 weeks for patients who received SRS alone. There were fewer recurrences at the site of the original brain metastasis in patients who underwent surgery plus SRS compared to SRS alone, 20 vs 52%, respectively. The quality of life of patients in the former group was also markedly improved.