Long-term outcome of concurrent chemotherapy and re-irradiation for recurrent and second primary head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomaLocoregional failure remains a serious problem in the management of head-and-neck cancer. Recent reports have demonstrated improved locoregional control (LRC) and survival rates with definitive or adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy (RT) alone. Despite these advances, local recurrences affect a large number of patients, especially with those with advanced primary stage disease. Furthermore, many patients treated with combined modality therapy develop second primary tumors. When recurrences occur in previously radiated fields, patients and oncologists have limited salvage options. For low-volume resectable disease, surgery is the standard of care. However, many patients are medically unfit for surgery, refuse surgery, or have unresectable disease. Nonsurgical candidates are usually offered chemotherapy, with a median survival of 6–8 months and little chance for cure . However, isolated locoregional recurrences in nonmetastatic patients can potentially be eradicated with aggressive treatment. Long-term survival rates of 37–50% have been reported after reirradiation of recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer. However, tumor clonogenic cells persisting through a course of RT are likely to be radioresistant. Adding radiosensitizing chemotherapy offers a method of enhancing the cell kill. At the University of Chicago, concomitant chemotherapy and reirradiation have been investigated for two decades. Most regimens have incorporated concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU), and RT as the base regimen (FHX). Both 5-FU and HU exhibit single-agent activity and radiosensitization of squamous cell head-and-neck cancer. Furthermore, 5-FU and HU act synergistically in vivo. We have previously reported the outcomes with FHX and regimens containing third agents paired with FHX for recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancers. Studies from the Institute Gustave Roussy, the University of Alabama-Birmingham, and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group have corroborated our results with FHX . The 4-year overall survival (OS) rates in these studies have been 22–43%. Some have questioned whether reirradiation toxicity outweighs the potential benefits, because the median survival of reirradiated patients marginally exceeds that of chemotherapy alone. However, the 2–3-year OS rates appear superior. We sought to identify subgroups of patients with nonmetastatic squamous cell cancer undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation who were more likely to benefit from an aggressive approach. Therefore, we analyzed patient- and treatment-related factors across several similarly designed Phase I and II trials investigating novel chemoradiotherapy regimens to determine their impact on OS, progression-free survival (PFS), LRC, and freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM). Purpose: To define favorable pretreatment characteristics for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control, and freedom from distant metastasis for patients with recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer treated with concomitant chemotherapy and reirradiation. Methods and Materials: Our study population comprised a subset of 115 previously irradiated patients without overt metastases from 304 poor-prognosis head-and-neck cancer patients treated in seven consecutive phase I-II protocols. Of the 115 patients, 49, who had undergone surgical resection, were treated with a median of four cycles of concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation and 66, who had not undergone surgical resection, were treated with a median of five cycles. The following regimens were used: 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with reirradiation (FHX) (n = 14), cisplatin plus FHX (n = 23), paclitaxel plus FHX (n = 42), gemcitabine plus paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil concurrent with reirradiation (n = 26), and irinotecan plus FHX (n = 10). Results: The median lifetime radiation dose was 131 Gy. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 67.4 months (range, 18.5–158.7). The median OS and PFS was 11 and 7 months (range, 0.2–158.7), respectively. The 3-year OS, PFS, locoregional control, and freedom from distant metastasis rate was 22%, 33%, 51%, and 61%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified reirradiation dose, triple agent (cisplatin-, paclitaxel-, or gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy), and surgery before protocol treatment as independently prognostic for OS, PFS, and locoregional control. Triple-agent chemotherapy was prognostic for freedom from distant metastasis. Nineteen patients died of treatment-related toxicity, five of these of carotid hemorrhage. Conclusion: For recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer, trimodality therapy with surgery, concurrent chemotherapy, and reirradiation for a full second dose offers potential for long-term survival. Owing to the substantial toxicity and lack of an optimal regimen, reirradiation of recurrent head-and-neck cancer should be limited to clinical trials. DiscussionA growing interest has developed in the use of concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation for previously radiated patients with recurrent or second primary head-and-neck cancer. Combination regimens including 5-FU, HU, and reirradiation have been adopted by investigators in Germany, France, India, and large cooperative groups. To the best of our knowledge, this report of seven sequential studies is the largest series of non–metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell cancer patients treated with full-dose reirradiation and concurrent 5-FU and HU-based chemotherapy. Previously, the Institute Gustave-Roussy reported their initial results of full-dose reirradiation on 169 unresectable patients with multiple histologic features. Of 106 patients treated with 5-FU, HU, and reirradiation on an alternating-week schedule, 12 were long-term survivors. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group tested the effect of cisplatin, paclitaxel, and hyperfractionated repeat RT in an alternating-week schedule in a phase II trial of 105 patients. As with all retrospective analyses, these data must be interpreted cautiously and considered to be hypothesis generating. However, the results of this analysis have demonstrated that surgical resection is independently associated with improved OS, PFS, and LRC. Owing to valid concerns for the chance of an oncologically incomplete operation, some surgeons are reluctant to operate in this setting. However, patients in this analysis who were able to undergo surgical resection had a 3-year PFS rate of 51% vs. 19% in patients who did not, These results have been validated by other investigators who reported a 3–4-year OS rate of 43–63% for resected patients adjuvantly treated with concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation compared with unresected patients who had a 4–5-year OS rate of 9–17%. Surgical cytoreduction may certainly benefit patients by decreasing the local tumor burden. However, the reduction in tumor burden may also decrease the volume of tissue that undergoes repeat RT, which has been shown to be associated with an improvement in survival. The repeat radiation dose was independently prognostic for OS, PFS, and LRC. Patients receiving ≥58 Gy had a 3-year OS rate of 30% and those receiving <58 Gy had a 3-year OS rate of 6%. The affect of the repeat radiation dose on previously radiated patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and RT has been demonstrated by some, but not all prior investigations. The impact of an increasing radiation dose was most profound in unresectable patients, with no long-term survivors in patients receiving <58 Gy. Furthermore, although not statistically significant, our nonsurgical patients treated with twice-daily RT had improved 3-year OS, PFS, LRC, and FFDM. In addition, 83% of long-term survivors were treated with twice-daily RT. This suggests that improving the dose intensity may be beneficial in this setting, just as it is in patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer undergoing initial definitive RT . These data suggest a potential benefit of a third or novel chemotherapeutic agent vs. 5-FU and HU alone. The use of cisplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel was the only prognostic variable associated with improved OS, PFS, LRC, and FFDM. Patients on these regimens experienced a 3-year PFS rate of 23% compared with 11% and 7.1% for those treated with irinotecan-FHX and FHX, respectively. The improvement in the FFDM with novel chemotherapy suggests that these agents are effective in controlling distant micrometastatic disease. Furthermore, 94% of long-term survivors received triple-agent chemotherapy. The benefit of increasing radiation doses and triple-agent chemotherapy on OS, PFS, and LRC in resected patients was interesting. This suggests that RT in combination with aggressive multiagent chemotherapy acts synergistically in the eradication of subclinical radioresistant clones in previously radiated patients. The lack of statistical benefit to triple-agent chemotherapy and only a trend for an increasing radiation dose on LRC in unresected patients suggests that newer targeted therapies paired with high-dose repeat RT may be necessary to treat larger, previously radiated, tumor volumes. Many have expressed quality-of-life concerns in the reirradiation setting. Our data suggest that most patients retain speech even after high radiation doses. Swallowing function is more problematic. Many of the surviving patients were dependent on feeding tubes. However, close analysis of the data revealed that most of these patients had been compromised by the tumor and treatment before reirradiation. Few additional patients became compromised after reirradiation. Only 6 patients experienced carotid hemorrhage, resulting in five deaths. This is comparable to other large series. The patients who experienced carotid hemorrhage were unresectable before reirradiation. Also, 5 of 6 patients had undergone previous surgery and RT. The number of patients experiencing carotid blowout was too small for formal analysis. However, it appears that unresectable patients who have previously undergone surgery and RT are at greater risk of carotid hemorrhage on full-dose reirradiation protocols. Only 1 patient with tumor adjacent to the spinal cord developed myelopathy. ConclusionFull-dose reirradiation with concurrent chemotherapy is a viable treatment option offering long-term survival for selected patients with recurrent or second primary head-and-neck cancer. No pretreatment characteristics predicted for survival or control. Trimodality therapy was associated with improved OS, PFS, and LRC. Dose-intensive regimens with triple-agent chemotherapy and high-dose RT resulted in better survival. Owing to the toxicity associated with treatment and limited knowledge of an optimal regimen, treatment of these patients should be limited to investigational protocols.
|